Kourtney Goodman
Data Chart Summary
Throughout
the years administrators and teachers have developed and used a variety of
tests to determine reading skills. All
of these tests have their strengths and weaknesses and it is important to be
aware of these when deciding which test to administer. While testing a group of students it is
important to be aware that one test does not work for all individuals. By becoming aware of the individual’s
capabilities, you may be able to figure out which test will give you the most
accurate score. It is important to keep
in mind which skills you are actually trying to test, as well as the population
you are testing (special needs or general education students). Being aware of what you are looking for and
who you are testing will make it much easier to decide which test to
administer.
The
purpose of each test varies a little.
When deciding which test to use, it is integral that you know which
skills you are actually trying to assess.
The Slosson Intelligence test, for example, is great for testing a
variety of skills. It tests
comprehension, ability to compare and contrast, vocabulary, etc. It can be administered quickly and it can be
scored during testing so it is very efficient.
In addition, it is very user-friendly which makes it a lot more accessible. However, there is not enough information
about test results for students with disabilities or those that are gifted, so
it is not effective to use with these groups of people. So while this may be an effective test for
some, it does not work for all populations.
A test such as the Slosson Oral Reading Test may be more suitable in
this situation.
The
SORT is also a very quick screening. It
can be used to determine a student’s reading level by targeting word
recognition. It is also effective
because it can be used with students with disabilities. In addition, it can be used on children and
adults. Unfortunately, this test is not
capable of measuring skills such as word knowledge, or comprehension. Therefore, if you have a student with a
disability and you want to test just word recognition this would be the test to
use. However, if you are trying to test
skills such as comprehension or word knowledge, it would be better to use a
different test.
The
Basic Reading Inventory is great for testing a wide variety of skills. It helps determine reading grade level and
can be used at the beginning and end of the school year to track progress. This test assesses comprehension, word
recognition, and speech. Unfortunately,
it takes a lot of time to administer.
Also, the results can be skewed if the student is not completely focused
on the test. This can make administering
the test to young children extremely difficult.
When testing skills related to phoneme recognition, the Wepman’s test of
auditory discrimination or the comprehensive test of phonological processing
would be the best tests to use.
The
Wepman’s test of auditory discrimination is very helpful in identifying
children who can’t recognize English phonemes.
It is very economical and can be administered and scored in five
minutes. In addition, it has already
been used on millions of children so the results are easy to compare. Unfortunately, it cannot be used to identify
specific learning disabilities.
Therefore, although it can test phonemic recognition, it can’t be used
to determine the root of the problem or which individual disability the student
has. Due to the nature of what this test
assesses, it is important to note that it can be used on preschool and
elementary students.
The
other test that assesses phonological skills, the Comprehensive test of
phonological processes, deals more with the process of recognition. It assesses the processing skills and where
there are strengths and weaknesses. This
test can also be used to identify those individuals who are not on the same
level as their peers in phonological abilities.
The CTOPP-2 can serve as a measurement device in the studies
investigating phonological processing.
Unfortunately this test is very time consuming which can lead to difficulties
when administering. The last test
covered is the Test of visual perceptual skills. It is very helpful with students who cannot
use words to express their responses.
The
Test of visual perceptual skills can also be very time consuming. However, it is effective as an assessment of
individual strengths and weaknesses.
This test can track progress over time which makes it a very useful
tool. The TVPS-3 is useful for students
with various disabilities because students are able to respond in a variety of
ways. This way, even if a student cannot
speak, they are able to show their understanding with another gesture. It is important to be aware of these
differences when deciding which test to use.
Just as these tests assess different skills, they are also more
effective with different populations.
Through this compare and contrast assignment it is easy to see how
certain tests would be a lot more effective with special needs students than
others.
While
reviewing the various tests it is clear that some work better with special
needs students while others will work more efficiently with general education
students. For example, it would not be
as effective to use the SIT because they do not have enough data collected on
people with disabilities or those that are gifted so it would be difficult to
determine where your results fall in the spectrum. On the other hand, the TVPS-3 is easily used
with students with various disabilities because its’ response format allows for
students to answer in a variety of ways.
This means that just because a student may not be able to speak, they
can still show that they understand with a hand gesture, visual gesture,
etc. This is very important because lack
of speech does not equate to lack of intelligence and we need to know what
these students are capable of understanding too. Just as it is important to keep in mind the
needs of the student, it is also important to be aware of the skills you are
actually trying to test.
Although
it may seem daunting to have all of these choices when it comes to picking the
best reading skills assessment, it becomes much easier if you know what age you
are testing, what skills you are looking for, and whether the students have
special needs. All of these tests have
their own strengths and weaknesses and it is important to be aware of these
when deciding which assessment to administer.
These tests can also be done in conjunction to ensure that you are
getting valid information. It is also
wise to administer the tests multiple times so that you can track the students’
progress. If used correctly, these tests
can be very helpful in identifying specific needs of the students.
Johns, J., (2012). Basic Reading Inventory. (11th Ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Martin, N., (2206).
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills.
McKechnie, J., & Bradley, E. (2001). Test
review Slosson Intelligence test- revised (sit-r). Retrieved from http://aac.ncat.edu/newsnotes/y01win.html.
Slosson, R., (2014).
Slosson Oral Reading Test- Revised
(sort-r3). Slosson Educational Publications Company.
Wepman, J., & Reynolds, W., (1987). Wepman’s
auditory discrimination test. (2nd Ed.). Retrieved from http://wpspublish.com/store/p/2649/wepmans-auditory-discrimination-test-second-edition-adt.
Comparing and Contrasting Reading Assessments
Purpose Strength Weakness
Appropriateness
SIT
(Slosson Intelligence Test)
|
-provides
a quick, reliable index of intellectual ability
-tests
a lot of different skills
|
-can
be done quickly
-can
be used on the blind/visually impaired
-administration
and scoring can be done at the same time
|
-it
can’t be used on it’s own as a screening
-lack
of information regarding the percentage of people with disabilities or those
who have been identified as gifted
|
-as
an initial screening or used in conjunction with other tests
-as
an assessment of verbal skills and ability
-can
be used as a quick screen for mental retardation
|
SORT
(Slosson Oral Reading Test)
|
-quick
screening to determine a student’s reading level
-targets
word recognition
-can
be used for regular education students as well as for many special needs
populations
|
-quick
and easy to use
-can
be administered at a very young age
|
-it
doesn’t measure all aspects of reading (example: word knowledge)
-it
is not a diagnostic tool
-does
not measure vocabulary or comprehension
|
-easily
used at every grade level
-can
be used at beginning and end of the year (to track progress)
|
BRI
(Basic Reading Inventory)
|
-helps
determine reading grade level by testing a number of skills
|
-tests
a variety of skills
-easy
to administer
-can
be used at any grade level
|
-takes
a lot of time to administer
-results
can be unreliable if the student has a lack of focus
|
-pretest
can help teacher determine a lesson plan that will help the student and
posttest will help determine progress
|
Wepman’s
Test of auditory discrimination)
|
-helps
identify children who can’t recognize English phonemes
|
-economical
-quick
(can be administered and scored in five minutes)
-already
used on millions of children
|
-cannot
be used to identify specific learning disabilities
|
-can
be used for preschool, kindergarten, and elementary children
-can
be used at half year intervals (for children from 4-8) to find a baseline and
track progress with phonemic discrimination
|
Test
of visual perceptual skills (TVPS-3)
|
-can
track progress over time
-assesses
individual strengths and weaknesses
|
-response
format suits all children including those that are disabled
-can
be administered at a range of ages
|
-difficult
to score
-time
consuming
|
-for
children with various disabilities
|
Comprehensive
test of phonological processing (CTOPP-2)
|
-assessment
of reading related phonological processing skills
|
-determines
strengths and weaknesses among developed phonological processes
|
-time
consuming
|
-identifying
those individuals who are not on the same level as their peers in
phonological abilities
-serves
as a measurement device in studies investigating phonological processing
|